Artboard 1capblog - Copy-1

Two Charts That Capture Q3 Earnings Season

Posted by Jonathan Ting on December 13, 2019

The Q3 2019 earnings season surprised mildly to the upside. 78% of companies beat their analyst EPS targets (vs a 10-year average of 63%) and 53% beat their analyst sales targets (vs a 10-year average of 53%).

Percent of Companies That Beat Analysts Targets

Earnings Season

Looking at the chart above, we see that over the past 3 years the number of companies that beat their EPS targets has increased to what seems like a sustainably new level between 70-80%.

This consistent outperformance looks great, unfortunately the sales paint a different picture.

Over the past few quarters, there has been a divergence in EPS vs sales performance. In fact, Q1 2019 saw the largest divergence of the past 20 years when 84% of companies beat on EPS, but only 26% beat on sales (68% missed). Since the 2008 financial crisis there have been only three extended periods of this kind of divergence that coincidentally align with disruptions in the market. 

  • On ‘Black Monday’ in 2011, rating agencies downgraded US sovereign debt from AAA to AA+, crashing the stock market. From peak to trough the S&P 500 dropped roughly 19%.
  • In 2015 China’s stock market crash sent shockwaves across global markets. From peak to trough the S&P 500 dropped roughly 15% and 19 months passed before it broke through previous highs.
  • The combination of (previously) rising interest rates and an escalating trade war is causing this third period of market disruption.

This makes sense. During periods of heightened uncertainty, aggregate demand slows. Companies end up selling less product, and sales underperform. Earnings, on the other hand, don’t because they can be manipulated through margin controls and share buybacks. For example, in 2018 over $1 trillion worth of buybacks was announced. Our research shows that had S&P 500 companies not engaged in these buybacks, year-on-year EPS would have actually contracted in every single quarter of 2019 to date.

Unfortunately for stock prices, the buyback frenzy is dying down and we are seeing signs, especially the rise in manufacturing input prices and tight labor market, that margin expansion has probably peaked.

If either demand does not return or forward EPS estimates are not brought down significantly, then 2020 EPS outperformance is at risk. As a result, CEO’s are already pulling back on their guidance numbers. 

Percent of Companies That Raised v. Lowered Profit Guidance Q3 2019

Profit Guidance

43% of companies lowered their FY2019 profit guidance ranges on their recent Q3 earnings calls, and another 27% have either kept them in-line or chosen not to give an update. Only 1/3 of companies have raised their guidance.

The technology sectors tend to be more growth-oriented, and without that culture of tight margin control in place, a pullback in demand hits the bottom line hard. Meanwhile, sectors like Process Industries and Producer Manufacturing, which have been most affected by the ongoing trade war but do have a culture of margin control, seem to be doing better than feared.

Topics: Market Outlook

    Get Started With  Mirador Today

    Recent Posts

    Subscribe to The Mirador View